HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1994

R. v. PANG HIN CHAU

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
32060-EN-1995-02-09

R. v. PANG HIN CHAU

HTML content

HCMA001487/1994

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 1487 OF 1994

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

____________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
PANG HIN CHAUAppellant

____________

 

Coram : Hon. Ryan, J. in Court

Date of hearing : 9 February 1995

Date of judgment : 9 February 1995

__________________

J U D G M E N T

__________________

 

1. The appellant was convicted after a plea of guilty to remaining in Hong Kong without the Authority of the Director of Immigration and he was sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment. He now appeals against that sentence.

2. The ground of appeal is that circumstances have changed since he was sentenced in that his mother-in-law has passed away and his wife has had a miscarriage. These facts are supported by documents from the Republic of China. In addition, there has been produced letters from the wife referring to the difficult circumstances caused by the failure of crops and to her depression following the miscarriage.

3. The appellant has already served 8 months of his sentence. I am satisfied that if the Magistrate had had these factors before him, he may well have taken a more lenient view than he did. Certainly no criticism can be directed at him for having imposed the term of 15 months' imprisonment. I propose to allow the appeal on humanitarian grounds, the sentence is reduced to a period which will allow for his immediate release and repatriation to China.

(T.J. Ryan)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr Madigan for Crown

Miss M. Rattigan (D.L.A.) for Appellant