HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1994

R. v. YAU HUNG YU

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
16447-EN-1995-02-16

R. v. YAU HUNG YU

HTML content

HCMA001506/1994

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.1506 OF 1994

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

_____________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
YAU HUNG YUAppellant

_____________

Coram : Hon Ryan, J. in Court

Date of hearing : 16 February 1995

Date of delivery of judgment : 16 February 1995

_________________

J U D G M E N T

_________________

 

1. The appellant was convicted on a plea of guilty to a charge of trafficking in a dangerous drug. The narcotic content of the mixture being 0.16 grammes.

2. The magistrate took as a starting point for sentence 3 years' imprisonment and after taking into account the guilty plea and other factors imposed a sentence of 2 years and 3 months' imprisonment. The Crown conceded that this was wrong in that Lau Tak Ming provides, in respect of a trafficking offence, after trial, for imprisonment of 2 to 5 years where the narcotic is less than 10 grammes. Given the small amount of narcotic the starting point, after trial, that the magistrate should have adopted should have been 2 years' imprisonment.

3. I allow the appeal and reduced the sentence to 12 months' imprisonment.

(T.J. Ryan)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr Arthur for Crown

Mr Paul K.N. Wu, inst'd by D.L.A., for Appellant