HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1994

R. v. LAU CHI WAI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
16405-EN-1995-02-15

R. v. LAU CHI WAI

HTML content

HCMA000157/1994

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 157 of 1994

____________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
LAU CHI WAIAppellant

_____________

 

Coram : Hon Ryan, J. in Court

Date of hearing :15 February 1995

Date of judgment : 15 February 1995

__________________

J U D G M E N T

__________________

 

1. The appellant was charged that on 1st November 1993 he stole a bicycle. He pleaded guilty to that charge and as he was at the time in the Training Centre, the magistrate quite properly made a concurrent order that he be detained in the Training Centre in respect of the theft charge.

2. He appealed against the conviction in respect of the offence for which he had first been sentenced to the Training Centre, and that appeal was allowed. It subsequently came to light that on 1st November 1993, he was still detained in the Training Centre and could quite clearly not have committed the offence for which he had been charged. His explanation was that he had simply pleaded guilty to get the matter out of the way.

3. He now applies for leave to appeal out of time in respect of the theft conviction, Mr Cheung for the Crown quite properly concedes the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the conviction is quashed.

(T.J. Ryan)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr W.S. Cheung for Crown

Mr Andy Hung, inst'd by D.L.A., for Appellant