HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1995

R. v. MOK KING CHING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
1145-EN-1995-08-11

R. v. MOK KING CHING

HTML content

CACC000146/1995

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1995, No. 146

(Criminal)

___________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN
AND
MOK KING CHING

___________

 

Coram: Hon. Yang C.J. & Ching J.A.

Date of hearing: 11 August 1995

Date of judgment: 11 August 1995

________________

J U D G M E N T

________________

Ching JA (delivering the judgment of the Court):

1. The applicant in this matter is a young man who was aged 17 years on the date of his conviction. He was convicted on the 9th of February this year of two charges to which he pleaded guilty.

2. The 1st charge was for assisting a passage within Hong Kong of unauthorised entrants and he was sentenced to imprisonment for four years. The 2nd charge was for endangering the safety of others at sea for which he was sentenced to imprisonment for three years. Two years of the latter sentence were ordered to be served concurrently with the sentence on the 1st charge so that effectively he has been sentenced to five years' imprisonment.

3. The facts are that he was in charge of a motorised sampan which was carrying illegal immigrants. There were many of them on board. The seas were choppy. When the sampan was detected by the police, it was pursued and the applicant who was steering the vessel tried to get away. There was, therefore, a chase with the applicant handling his sampan in what can only be described as a most dangerous way. Eventually, his vessel collided with that of the police. The sampan was so overloaded that it sank within three seconds of the collision. All of the occupants were thrown into the sea and were rescued by the police. The applicant himself, his co-helmsman and two pregnant women suffered injuries.

4. These offences were very serious and could well have resulted in the loss of life. In the circumstances, the sentence of five years' imprisonment imposed was in no way excessive, and the application is, therefore, dismissed.

(T. L. Yang)(Charles Ching)
Chief JusticeJustice of Appeal

Representation:

Mr John Reading, S.A.C.P., for Crown/Respondent

Applicant in person