HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1995

R. v. LAM TIM KIT

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
2147-EN-1995-10-06

R. v. LAM TIM KIT

HTML content

CACC000238/1995

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1995, No. 238
(Criminal)

___________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
LAM TIM KITApplicant

___________

 

Coram: Hon Power, V.-P. and Mayo, J.A.

Date of hearing: 6 October 1995

Date of judgment: 6 October 1995

________________

J U D G M E N T

________________

Mayo, J.A. (giving the judgment of the Court):

1. The applicant seeks leave to appeal against the sentences of 4½ years' imprisonment for robbery and one month imprisonment for possession of a small quantity of dangerous drugs.

2. At about 21.30 hours on the evening of 19 February 1994, while PW1 and PW2 who were both sales ladies were working at a store called In and Out Fashion Shop in Causeway Bay, the defendant entered the shop and asked PW1 to let him use the telephone. The applicant then produced a knife about 8 inches long and told PW1 and PW2 to take out all their money and not to do anything rash. He pushed PW1 and PW2 into the storeroom and ordered both of them to squat on the floor. Understandably both these witnesses were very frightened.

3. The applicant used the clothes inside the shop to tie up PW2 and gagged her mouth. He took a number of personal possessions, cash and bank cards from the victims.

4. The applicant was apprehended the next day. PW2's identity card and bank card were found in his possession. There also was a packet containing the dangerous drugs which are the subject matter of the second charge.

5. The applicant pleaded guilty to these offences.

6. His Honour Judge Muttrie followed the guidelines in Mo Kwong-sang and adopted six years as the starting point on the robbery and gave the applicant credit for his guilty plea.

7. The applicant claims that the sentence imposed was excessive. We disagree. We would however observe that the discount which was given by His Honour Judge Muttrie was not over generous. However having regard to all the circumstances of the case we can see no reason to interfere with the sentences which were imposed and dismiss this application.

(N.P. Power)(Simon Mayo)
Vice PresidentJustice of Appeal

Representation:

Ms Wong Kam Hing for Crown Prosecutor

Lam Tam-kit, Applicant - in person/present