HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1995

THE QUEEN v. CHIN CHI HO

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER

Files (2)

2512-EN-1996-11-14

R. v. CHIN CHI HO

HTML content

CACC000274/1995

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

No.274 of 1995
(Criminal)

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
CHIN CHI HOApplicant

____________

 

Coram: Hon. Nazareth, V.-P. and Wong, J.

Date of Hearing: 14 November 1996

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 14 November 1996

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

Wong, J. (giving the judgment of the Court):

1. The applicant was convicted after trial before Deputy Judge Lung in the District Court of one charge of robbery and sentenced to four years' imprisonment. His application for leave to appeal against conviction was dismissed on 27th February 1996. He now applies for leave to appeal against sentence out of time.

2. The prosecution case was that after the victim had entered the lift of her apartment block, the applicant and another man followed her. Inside the lift, one put his arm around her neck from behind and the other assaulted her. She dropped her black handbag and one of them picked it up before they ran away. She chased them and raised hue and cry. Others as well as policemen on patrol in the area joined in the chase and both men were caught. The other man who was the first defendant at trial was holding a black handbag which the victim identified to be hers. The applicant denied any involvement when he was cautioned. However, he admitted that he was present at the assault. He was identified by the victim in an identification parade as one of the two men who had robbed her.

3. He could advance no reason for the delay to apply for leave to appeal against sentence. The application is refused. We would add that the sentence of four years' imprisonment imposed on conviction after trial of a lift robbery is an entirely proper sentence.

(G.P. Nazareth)(Michael Wong)
Vice-PresidentJudge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr. Dick, S.C.C. for the Crown.

Applicant in person.

47110-EN-1996-02-27

THE QUEEN v. CHIN CHI HO

HTML content