HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1995

R. v. TSE KA MING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
4304-EN-1996-01-09

R. v. TSE KA MING

HTML content

CACC000439/1995

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

No. 439 of 1995
(Criminal)

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
TSE KA MINGAppellant

--------------------

Coram: Bokhary, J.A. and Bewley, J. in Court

Date of hearing: 9 January 1996

Date of delivery of judgment: 9 January 1996

-------------------------

J U D G M E N T

-------------------------

Bewley, J.: (giving the judgment of the Court)

1. The applicant was convicted of one charge of robbery and was sentenced to a term of 3 years and 9 months by Deputy Judge Chu.

2. At 10 p.m. on 16th March, 1994, the applicant threatened a couple with a knife in a public park. He and his accomplice escorted the male victim to a nearby 7-Eleven store, where the victim changed a $500 note. The applicant took $300 and left. He was 19 at the time of the offence.

3. In July, 1994, he was convicted of smoking dangerous drugs and placed on probation. The probation officer has reported a poor response to probation. The Commissioner of Correctional Services has reported that he is drug dependent and suitable for the Drug Addiction Treatment Centre, but not the Training Centre or Detention Centre.

4. The applicant told the judge he did not wish to go to the DATC. Today he merely asks for a reduction in sentence.

5. The judge took a starting point of 5 years' imprisonment and gave the applicant a 25% discount for his youth. We cannot say that that was wrong and we refuse the application.

(K. Bokhary)(E. de B. Bewley)
Justice of AppealJudge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr David Chan, S.C.C., for Crown/Respondent

Applicant (Tse Ka Ming) in person