HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1995

R. v. LAM CHI PANG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
5184-EN-1996-01-09

R. v. LAM CHI PANG

HTML content

CACC000525/1995

No. 525 of 1995
(Criminal)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
LAM CHI PANGApplicant

--------------------

 

Coram: Bokhary, J.A. and Bewley, J. in Court

Date of hearing: 9 January 1996

Date of delivery of judgment: 9 January 1996

--------------------

J U D G M E N T

--------------------

Bewley, J.: (giving the judgment of the Court)

1. The applicant pleaded guilty to one charge of theft and one charge of making a false report of an offence. He was sentenced to a total of 20 months' imprisonment by Judge Caird.

2. The applicant was the proprietor of a Hong Kong trading company, which was in financial difficulties. The victim was the proprietor of a Shenzhen trading company and they had business dealings together.

3. On 8th March, 1995, the victim gave the applicant a bank draft for $1,580,000. It was to be brought to Hong Kong by the applicant and applied to the payment of the victim's creditors. The following day he deposited the draft in the Bank of China in Hong Kong but immediately withdrew that sum in cash, which he gave to an accomplice with instructions to deposit it in various bank accounts and retain the balance of $400,000. He then took some sleeping pills and became dizzy. Later he made a false report to the police that his friend had swindled him. He broke down under questioning and confessed. All but $51,233 of this money has been recovered.

4. He has one irrelevant previous conviction and he now expresses his remorse and says his family is facing hardship. But this was a serious breach of trust. The mitigating factors were his plea of guilty and the recovery of the money.

5. Nevertheless, we feel that the sentence was not wrong in principle and was not manifestly excessive. We therefore refuse the application.

(K. Bokhary)(E. de B. Bewley)
Justice of AppealJudge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr David Chan, S.C.C., for Crown/Respondent

Applicant (Lam Chi Pang) in person