HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1995

R. v. LEE CHI MING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
5773-EN-1996-01-09

R. v. LEE CHI MING

HTML content

CACC000588/1995

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1995, No.588
(Criminal)

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
LEE CHI MINGApplicant

----------------

Coram: Bokhary, J.A. and Bewley, J. in Court

Date of hearing: 9 January 1996

Date of judgment : 9 January 1996

 

-------------------------

J U D G M E N T

-------------------------

 

Bewley, J.: (Giving the judgment of the Court)

1. The applicant pleaded guilty to 19 charges of theft. He was sentenced to a total of 3½ years' imprisonment by Judge Beeson.

2. The applicant was a client of a stockbroking firm. He also acted on behalf of five other clients, who gave him authority to buy and sell shares and warrants.

3. In August, 1990, the applicant withdrew $850,000 from his bank accounts and left for Macau without settling 19 transactions valued in total $805,365. No shares or warrants remained in any of the accounts. These transactions were dated between February and July that year.

4. In May, 1995, the applicant returned to Hong Kong to visit his ailing mother and he was arrested.

5. In his grounds of appeal the applicant says his wife wanted to leave Hong Kong, which caused him to become disturbed, and he lost money in speculation. His wife has now died. He has an old father. He now wishes to compensate his victims. He has no relevant previous conviction. The only other mitigating factors are his plea of guilty and his voluntary return, although the judge doubted if the latter was prompted by genuine remorse. She suspected that he was merely tired of being on the run and wanted to see his mother.

6. Having regard to the breach of trust, the number of offences and the large amount of missing money, we are unable to say that the total sentence is manifestly excessive. We refuse the application.

(K. Bokhary)(E. de B. Bewley)
Justice of AppealJudge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr David Chan, S.C.C., for Crown/Respondent

Applicant Lee Chi-ming in person