HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1995

R. v. LUI TAI YEUNG and Another

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
6155-EN-1996-03-21

R. v. LUI TAI YEUNG and Another

HTML content

CACC000632/1995

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1995, No. 632
(Criminal)

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN
AND
LUI TAI YEUNG
WAI PING SUM

----------

Coram : Hon Yang, C.J., Power, V.-P. and Mortimer, J.A.

Date of Hearing : 21 March 1996

Date of Judgment : 21 March 1996

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

Hon Yang, CJ:

1. This is an application for leave to appeal against conviction on the grounds that the verdicts in respect of the first and second counts were inconsistent.

2. The applicants were acquitted of the first count of murder but convicted of the second count of wounding with intent.

3. The point in issue at trial was one of joint enterprise. On the evidence before the court below, it was quite clear that if the applicants were found not guilty of murder, it would follow that they were not guilty of the wounding as both the wounding and the murder took place at the same time and at the same place.

4. In his usual candidness and fairness, Mr Cross does not oppose the application. We therefore allow the application, treat the hearing of the application as the hearing of the appeal and allow the appeal. The conviction is quashed and sentence set aside.

( T L Yang )( N P Power )( J B Mortimer )
Chief JusticeVice PresidentJustice of Appeal

Representation:

Mr Duncan Percy (DLA) for Applicants

Mr I G Cross QC and Ms M A Crabtree of the Attorney General's Chambers for Crown/Respondent