HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1995

R. v. CHAU CHI HIN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
6468-EN-1996-04-03

R. v. CHAU CHI HIN

HTML content

CACC000679/1995

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1995, No. 679
(Criminal)

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
CHAU CHI HINApplicant

----------------------

Coram: Hon Mortimer, J.A. and Mayo, J.A.

Date of hearing: 3 April 1996

Date of judgment: 3 April 1996

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

Mayo, J.A. (giving the judgment of the Court):

1. The applicant who was only 16 years old at the time of his offence seeks leave to appeal against the sentence of five years' imprisonment imposed upon him for trafficking in dangerous drugs. He was caught in a stop and search exercise by the police and pleaded guilty to the offence. The amount of dangerous drugs involved in 327 grams of a mixture containing 52.84 grams of heroin.

2. The applicant claimed to have given assistance concerning the prosecution of one of his associates. We are told by Mr Veltro for the Crown that this is not so. The supplier was arrested but this was not as a result of information which had been provided by the applicant.

3. The amount of dangerous drugs involved brings it within the third tier of category in Lau Tak-ming. The applicant was given a discount in excess of 33%. This sentence was neither wrong in principle nor manifestly excessive and the application is accordingly dismissed.

(Barry Mortimer)(Simon Mayo)
Justice of AppealJustice of Appeal

Representation:

Mr F. Veltro for Crown Prosecutor

CHAU Chi-hin - Applicant in person/present