HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1995

R. v. LING HOI KWONG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
6959-EN-1996-05-08

R. v. LING HOI KWONG

HTML content

CACC000762/1995

1995, No.762
(Criminal)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

BETWEEN
The QUEENRespondent
AND
LING HOI KWONGApplicant

----------------

Coram : Hon Power, V.-P., Bokhary, J.A. and Sears, J. in Court

Date of hearing : 8 May 1996

Date of judgment : 8 May 1996

------------------------

J U D G M E N T

------------------------

Sears, J. : (giving the judgment of the Court)

1. This Applicant was convicted after trial on November 10th last year before H.H. Judge Andrée Wiltens of assisting the passage within Hong Kong of an unauthorised entrant, contrary to s.37D(1)(a) of the Immigration Ordinance.

2. The facts were very brief. In the early hours of the morning of August 14th, patrolling police officers at Deep Bay noticed an unlit vessel sailing towards Mainland China. They signalled the vessel to stop. It accelerated and they chased it. The Defendant was seen sitting by the helm of the vessel which was a fibre glass sampan. There was one other person in the boat, both of them had Boat Person's Cards and neither had documents permitting them to leave China.

3. The Defendant was arrested and he made a statement under caution admitting that he had brought the unauthorised entrant from Shekou for $1,000.

4. The real issue of the trial was the voluntariness or not of the confession statement - the Applicant saying that it was an involuntary statement. The Judge held a voire dire and ruled it in. The Defendant then gave evidence that he had been brought to Hong Kong to look for work and was returning home when they were arrested. The Judge did not believe him.

5. We have examined the papers with care. We can find nothing which in any way flaws this conviction. The application is dismissed.

(N.P. Power)(K. Bokhary)(R.A.W. Sears)
Vice-PresidentJustice of AppealJudge of the High court

Representation:

Ms Crabtree, D.P.C.C. (Crown Prosecutor), for the Respondent

Applicant in person