HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1995

R. v. CHAN KWOK PING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
7139-EN-1996-04-03

R. v. CHAN KWOK PING

HTML content

CACC000806/1995

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1995, No. 806
(Criminal)

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
CHAN KWOK PINGApplicant

----------------------

Coram: Hon Mortimer, J.A. and Mayo, J.A.

Date of hearing: 3 April 1996

Date of judgment: 3 April 1996

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

Mayo, J.A. (giving the judgment of the Court):

1. The applicant seeks leave to appeal against a total sentence of three years and nine months' imprisonment imposed upon him for three counts of theft. The application was made out of time but as it was only a few days out of time we gave leave for the application to proceed.

2. Dealing with the merits of the application it has to be said that all three of these theft cases were committed separately and independently. The facts of two of the thefts were very close indeed to robberies. The applicant claimed that at the time of the offences that he was under the influence of dangerous drugs. This does not constitute mitigation. He did however plead guilty to the offences and of course this does constitute mitigation.

3. The offences were serious and even though an insufficient discount may have been given when consideration is given to the overall gravity of the offences the end result of three years and nine months' imprisonment was not a manifestly excessive sentence. The application is accordingly dismissed.

(Barry Mortimer)(Simon Mayo)
Justice of AppealJustice of Appeal

Representation:

Mr F. Veltro for Crown Prosecutor

CHAN Kwok-ping - Applicant in person/present