HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1995

R. v. LEE PING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
7183-EN-1995-08-24

R. v. LEE PING

HTML content

CACC000082/1995

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1995, No.82

(Criminal)

___________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN
AND
LEE PING

___________

 

Coram: Hon. Power, V.-P., Bokhary & Ching, JJ.A.

Date of hearing: 24 August 1995

Date of judgment: 24 August 1995

________________

J U D G M E N T

________________

Power, V.-P.(giving the judgment of the Court):

This applicant was charged with trafficking in a dangerous drug. He was stopped in a routine stop and search operation when the drugs were found on his person. That was the Crown evidence. He suggested at trial and still suggests that the majority of the drugs were planted upon him by the police. The trial judge had no hesitation in rejecting his evidence and accepting that of police officers. The applicant in his appeal does no more in effect than say that the trial judge was wrong to do so. The assessment of the evidence at the trial was a matter for the trial judge and nothing has been said that would raise any ground for us interfering with his decision in that regard. The application must be dismissed.

(N.P. Power)(K. Bokhary)(Charles Ching)
Vice-PresidentJustice of AppealJustice of Appeal

Representation:

Ms. Lily Ho (Crown Prosecutor) for the Respondent.

Applicant in person.