HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1995

R. v. YASH PAUL GORAYA

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
16542-EN-1995-12-11

R. v. YASH PAUL GORAYA

HTML content

HCMA001019/1995

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 1019 OF 1995

___________

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
and
YASH PAUL GORAYAAppellant

___________

Coram: Hon Duffy J. in Court

Date of hearing: 5 December 1995

Date of handing down judgment: 11 December 1995

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1. This was an appeal against a total sentence of 12 months imposed for offences of theft and breach of condition of stay which attracted sentences of three months each, ordered to be run concurrently; and using a Hong Kong Identity Card relating to another person, for which a sentence of 12 months was passed, which was ordered to run consecutively to the other sentences.

2. These were perfectly proper sentences and fell within the normal range of sentences for offences of this nature. However, as an act of mercy, because of his family circumstances, I felt that I could reduce the sentence of 12 months on the charge of using an identity card relating to another person to nine months. The total sentence therefore became 12 months.

(J.M. Duffy)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr F. Veltro, S.C.C., for Crown

Appellant Yash Paul Goraya in person