HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1995

R. v. LEUNG KAM FUK

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
16548-EN-1995-12-12

R. v. LEUNG KAM FUK

HTML content

HCMA001044/1995

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL No.1044 of 1995

___________

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
and
LEUNG KAM FUKAppellant

___________

Coram: Hon. Duffy, J. in Court

Date of hearing: 6 December 1995

Date of handing down judgment: 12 December 1995

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1. This was an appeal against a sentence of 6 months' imprisonment imposed for an offence of obtaining property by deception. The allegation was that the appellant who worked for the China Motion Paging Ltd. altered the contents of a Sales and Services Agreement so that he could dishonestly obtain, by deception, $3,104.40.

2. The learned Magistrate's reasons for passing a sentence of 6 months' imprisonment involved his decision that the breach of trust was a serious matter, although the amount involved was not a large amount. I agreed that this was a case involving breach of trust, but it was also a case involving only one small transaction.

3. The 32 year old appellant was effectively a first offender, with a wife and three daughters, and heavy financial commitments. Some sense of perspective must be retained about the passing of prison sentences for offences of this sort. In the circumstances, I felt that a 6 months sentence was manifestly excessive. A suspended sentence would have been justified. I therefore allowed the appeal so that the appellant could be released from prison immediately. I also ordered that he repay to the China Motion Paging Company the full sum of $3,104.40.

(J.M. Duffy)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr Tam Yiu-ho William C.C. for Crown

Miss Esther Toh, (Joseph W.K. Poon & Co.), for Appellant