HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1995

THE QUEEN v. CHEUNG LIK

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
16568-EN-1996-02-06

THE QUEEN v. CHEUNG LIK

HTML content

HCMA001141/1995

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.1141 OF 1995

--------------------

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
CHEUNG LIKAppellant

--------------------

Coram : Hon Duffy, J. in Court

Date of hearing : 31 January 1996

Date of handing down judgment : 6 February 1996

-------------------------

J U D G M E N T

-------------------------

1. This was an appeal against a total sentence of 15 months imposed as follows : 15 months' imprisonment was ordered for the Appellant's being in Hong Kong illegally, and 4 months' imprisonment for an offence of theft. The sentences were ordered to be served concurrently.

2. In the appeal, the Appellant advanced her own ill health and that of her husband as humanitarian reasons for reduction of the sentence. However, in a medical report, which had been obtained by the learned Magistrate in relation to the Appellant, she had been found to be in satisfactory health. In support of her submission that her husband was ill, she produced certificates, whose authenticity was clearly in doubt.

3. She told me she was 62 years of age although on the Magistrate's note she was recorded as being aged 60 in July 1995. She told me that the reason for this was that there was a different method of assessing age in China.

4. All in all, I was unimpressed by the lady's reasons for sentence, but as she was 60 years of age, at least, and as she had only two months to serve of her sentence, as an act of mercy, I allowed the appeal so that she could be released immediately.

Representation:

Mr Tam Yiu Ho, S.C.C., for Crown

Appellant (Cheung Lik) in person

- 2 -

(J.M. Duffy)
Judge of the High Court