HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1995

R. v. NG TSUI SANG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
16576-EN-1996-01-17

R. v. NG TSUI SANG

HTML content

HCMA001192/1995

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL
NO. 1192 OF 1995

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
NG TSUI SANGAppellant

---------------

Coram : Hon Duffy, J. in Court

Date of hearing : 12 January 1996

Date of handing down judgment : 17 January 1996

------------------------

J U D G M E N T

------------------------

Duffy, J.:

1. This was an appeal against a conviction for failing to comply with traffic light signals. The only evidence against the appellant was that given by a police officer. The appellant did not give evidence. On his appeal he claimed that he totally misunderstood the learned Magistrate when being asked whether or not he wanted to give evidence, this being his first ever appearance in a court. There is always a potential difficulty when an appellant is unrepresented in explaining his rights. I gave him the benefit of the doubt and ordered that the matter be retried.

Representation:

Mr David Chan, S.C.C., for Crown

Appellant in person

(J.M. Duffy)
Judge of the High Court