HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1995

R. v. NGUYEN VAN PHONG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
16464-EN-1995-05-24

R. v. NGUYEN VAN PHONG

HTML content

HCMA000121/1995

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 121 OF 1995

____________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN
AND
NGUYEN VAN PHONG

____________

Coram: The Hon. Mr. Justice Sears in Court

Date of hearing: 24 May 1995

Date of delivery of judgment: 24 May 1995

_________________

J U D G M E N T

_________________

 

1. This Appellant was sentenced at the South Kowloon Magistrates' Court on December 5 1994. This Vietnamese had sneaked back into Hong Kong to look for his wife, he had taken his son and daughter back to Vietnam under the voluntary repatriation scheme but his wife did not want to go back, she stayed here. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 6 months' imprisonment for possession of a forged Vietnamese Refugee Card and 15 months for remaining in Hong Kong without authority which is a standard sentence for Chinese illegal immigrants. This was a dramatically different set of circumstances. Although it merited a prison sentence, in my judgment, it should have been less. I reduce the sentence on the 2nd Count to such sentence of imprisonment as permits his release today but he is in the custody of Immigration authorities pending deportation. This is equivalent to a 9 months sentence.

Representation:

Mr. William Lam, S.C.C. for Crown

Mr. Richard Wong (DLA) for Appellant

(R.A.W. Sears)
Judge of the High Court