HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1995

THE QUEEN v. BIAGTAN DANILO P.

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
32262-EN-1996-03-12

THE QUEEN v. BIAGTAN DANILO P.

HTML content

HCMA001241/1995

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 1241 OF 1995

------------------

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
BIAGTAN DANILO P.Appellant

-------------------

Coram : Hon Duffy, J. in Court

Date of hearing : 7 March 1996

Date of handing down judgment : 12 March 1996

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

1. This was an appeal against a sentence of nine months for making a false representation to an Immigration Officer. The learned Magistrate, relying on the case of Javed Asif & Another, Magistracy Appeal No. 1770 of 1990, imposed a sentence of nine months.

2. Mr Raffell who appeared on the appeal submitted that he was wrong to rely on the case of Javed Asif but should have relied on a number of other authorities, one of which was R. v. Bhagwant Singh-Padda, Magistracy Appeal No. 1447 of 1988. In these cases, a sentence of six months was found to be appropriate for offences of this nature. I agreed and reduced the sentence to one of six months. The appeal was allowed accordingly.

Representation:

Mr W.S. Cheung, D.P.C.C., for Crown

Mr Andrew Raffell (D.L.A.) for Appellant

- 2 -

(J.M. Duffy)
Judge of the High Court