HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1995

THE QUEEN v. CHOW MEI-YUNG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
36606-EN-1995-03-02

THE QUEEN v. CHOW MEI-YUNG

HTML content

HCMA000139/1995

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

 

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 139 OF 1995

-----------------

 

BETWEEN  
 THE QUEEN 
 and 
 CHOW MEI-YUNG 

-----------------

Coram: The Hon. Mr. Justice Wong in Court

Date of Hearing: 2nd March, 1995

Date of Judgment: 2nd March, 1995

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant pleaded guilty before a magistrate to a charge of employing a person not lawfully employable contrary to section 171 (1) of the Immigration Ordinance, Cap. 115. She was sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment. Against that sentence, she now appeals.

2. In the afternoon of 24 December 1994, a team of police officers on patrol inside Kin Sang Market, Kin Sang Estate, Tuen Mun saw a female selling vegetable at a stall with the appellant. They demanded to see their identity cards and the female was unable to produce it. The female admitted under caution that she was an illegal immigrant and had been employed by the appellant since 20 November 1994 as her assistant to sell vegetables at her stall at $20 an hour. The female was charged and pleaded guilty to the offence of remaining in Hong Kong without the authority of the Director of Immigration. She was sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment.

3. Having considered submissions of Counsel and borne in mind the decision of the Court of Appeal in R v Wong Mok Din, Magistracy Appeal No. 553 of 1992, I am satisfied that an immediate custodial sentence is inperative and the starting point of such a sentence is 15 months' imprisonment. Taking into consideration the plea of guilty and the clear record of the appellant, I would reduce the sentence to 9 months' imprisonment and the appeal is allowed to this extent.

  

  

 (Michael Wong)
 Judge of the High Court

     

Representation:

Miss V.A. Hartstein for Crown

Mr. Y.C. Yeung (M/s Leung Kin & Co.) for appellant