HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1995

R. v. KONG PO HONG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
32073-EN-1995-06-09

R. v. KONG PO HONG

HTML content

HCMA000229/1995

IN THE HIGH COURT

1995, No. 229
Magistracy Appeal

__________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN
AND
KONG PO HONG

__________

 

Coram: Hon Litton, V.-P. sitting as an additional High Court Judge

Date of hearing: 9 June 1995

Date of judgment: 9 June 1995

 

________________

J U D G M E N T

________________

 

Litton, V.-P.:

1. This is an appeal against sentence. The appellant pleaded guilty before Mr Wright at the Eastern Magistracy on two charges: one of burglary; the other of common assault.

2. The crimes occurred on the same day and same occasion, 20 December 1993, when the appellant entered the premises of Chung Luen Forwarding Agencies on the 1/F, Hop Wai Building in North Point and robbed the inmates of those premises of a portable telephone, some coins and cash of $1200 belonging to a person present there. He also assaulted that person and that constituted the second charge.

3. The magistrate dealt with the underlying facts with care. The appellant has a criminal record, having been convicted of theft in 1980 and assault occasioning actual bodily harm in 1993. He was divorced at the time and paid a substantial proportion of his monthly income to his former wife as maintenance for her and for their child. The appellant also contributed to the support of his parents.

4. The magistrate took into account every relevant circumstance and sentenced the appellant on the burglary charge to 18 months' imprisonment and on the common assault charge to three months' imprisonment consecutive to the first charge making a total of 21 months. The sentences are neither excessive nor wrong in principle and the appeal is dismissed.

Representation:

Mr Wesley W.C. Wong (Crown Prosecutor) for Respondent/Crown

Appellant in person

(Henry Litton)
Vice President