HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1995

THE QUEEN v. LEE YUEN LING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
27879-EN-1995-03-23

THE QUEEN v. LEE YUEN LING

HTML content

HCMA000023/1995

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

 

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 23 OF 1995

-----------------

 

BETWEEN  
 THE QUEENRespondent
 and 
 LEE YUEN LINGAppellant

-----------------

Coram: The Hon. Mr. Justice Wong in Court

Date of Hearing: 23rd March 1995

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 23rd March 1995

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. On 23rd November 1994, the appellant appeared before a magistrate and pleaded guilty to one charge of possession of dangerous drug and was sentenced to 9 months' imprisonment.

2. The facts were that at about 1040 hours on 30th July 1994, the appellant was stopped by two police constables on patrol at the junction of Hei Lung Lane and Temple Street, Yaumati. A search was conducted and inside her handbag the officers found a plastic bag containing 23 plastic bags of a mixture of 8.36 grammes containing 3.13 grammes of salts of esters of morphine. On 11th November 1994, the appellant was sentenced in another court to detention in the Drug Addiction Treatment Centre for an offence of theft.

3. Before me, the appellant asked not to be sent back to the Drug Addiction Treatment Centre after she had served her prison sentence because she would have got rid of her habit after 9 months. There is an element of common sense. There would be no point to send her back if she manages to quit her drug habit.

4. Accordingly, I would allow the appeal, quash the DATC order and increase the sentence of 9 months to 12 months' imprisonment.

 

 

 (Michael Wong)
 Judge of the High Court

 

Representation:

Mr. W.S. Cheung, D.P.C.C. & W. Chan, C.C. for the Crown.

Appellant in person.