HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1995

R. v. MUHAMMAD HANIF alias RASHID KHAN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
16497-EN-1995-06-21

R. v. MUHAMMAD HANIF alias RASHID KHAN

HTML content

HCMA000528/1995

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.528 OF 1995

___________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
MUHAMMAD HANIF
alias RASHID KHAN
Appellant

___________

 

Coram: Hon Patrick Chan, J. in Court

Date of hearing: 21 June 1995

Date of judgment: 21 June 1995

________________

J U D G M E N T

________________

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to two counts, using an unlawfully obtained travel document and making a false statement to the Immigration Officer when he came. He was sentenced to 6 months and 3 months imprisonment respectively, both sentences to run concurrently.

2. He was stopped by the police in the street for overstaying and it was subsequently found out that he had previously committed a similar offence under a different identity and had been repatriated to his home country. On this occasion he made use of a forged Pakistani passport and gained entry into Hong Kong. The appellant asked for pity. He said he was the sole breadwinner of the family and that his father had a heart disease.

3. In my view, there is absolutely no merit in this appeal. There are no special circumstances. When I look at the learned magistrate's Reasons for Sentence, I find that she has given sufficient consideration to the circumstances of the appellant. In fact, my attention was drawn to the fact that the normal sentence for a non-Chinese illegal immigrant who made use of an unlawfully obtained travel document ranges from 9 to 18 months on a plea of guilty and for making a false representation, the usual term is between 3 to 6 months upon a plea. So the sentences in this case are entirely within the normal tariff and I must say they are probably on the lighter side. The appeal is dismissed.

(Patrick Chan)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr P. Cantrill, S.C.C., for Crown

Appellant, Muhanad Hanif alias Rashid Khan, in person