HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1995

R. v. YUNG PING HUNG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
16518-EN-1995-11-28

R. v. YUNG PING HUNG

HTML content

HCMA000808/1995

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL No. 808 of 1995

___________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
YUNG PING HUNGAppellant

___________

 

Coram: Hon. Duffy, J. in Court

Date of hearing: 22 November 1995

Date of handing down judgment: 28 November 1995

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1. This was an appeal against a sentence of 4 months' imprisonment for assault occasioning actual bodily harm. The assault resulted from a dispute between two drivers which had occurred at the exit to the carpark at the Hong Kong International Airport.

2. During a "Newton" enquiry before the learned Magistrate, the victim described an assault which involved a number of blows and a lot of blood coming from his nose. The medical report, however, described very minor injuries indeed, and did not seem to support the account of events given by the victim.

3. While it is always a serious matter for people to resort to violence to settle minor agitations or disputes, this was, in my view, not a case which demanded immediate imprisonment. There is no doubt that a custodial sentence was an appropriate sentence in view of the nature and circumstances of the attack, but the minor nature of the injuries persuaded me that the attack was not nearly so serious as the victim made out. I, therefore, felt that the prison sentence could be suspended, and allowed the appeal ordering that the sentence of immediate imprisonment be suspended for one year.

(J.M. Duffy)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr Eddie Sean, S.C.C. & Miss Blanca Cheng, C.C., for Crown

Mr Edward Laskey (C.K. Mok & Co.) for Appellant