THE QUEEN v. CHAN KAM KWONG
HTML content
HCMA000946/1995
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG
(Appellate Jurisdiction)
MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.946 OF 1995
--------------------
| BETWEEN | ||
| THE QUEEN | Respondent | |
| AND | ||
| CHAN KAM KWONG | Appellant |
--------------------
Coram : Hon Duffy, J. in Court
Date of hearing : 21 December 1995
Date of handing down judgment : 3 January 1996
-------------------------
J U D G M E N T
-------------------------
1. This was an appeal against a conviction for blackmail and resisting a police officer and a sentence of training centre.
2. The appellant appeared in person. At the end of the trial, giving his reasons for verdict, the learned Magistrate said this :
"Prima facie the defendant have thus committed blackmail unless defendant can show that he (defendant) had reasonable grounds for making the demand, - subject to accepting PW1's evidence of the conversation between defendant and PW1."
This was a manifest misdirection in law imposing an onus on the appellant which did not exist. While it is correct to say that it is for the defence to raise the issue of reasonable grounds, it is always then for the prosecution to negative, never for the defence to "show" or prove, that the grounds are reasonable. The appeal had to be allowed. As the matter was a serious matter, and as the evidence in support of it was strong, I ordered a retrial before a different magistrate.
Representation:
Mr W.S. Cheung, C.C., for Crown
Appellant (Chan Kam Kwong) in person
| (J.M. Duffy) | |
| Judge of the High Court |