HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1995

THE QUEEN v. MAK MUN-LIN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
32182-EN-1995-12-20

THE QUEEN v. MAK MUN-LIN

HTML content

HCMA000979/1995

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 979 OF 1995

---------------

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
MAK MUN-LINAppellant

---------------

Coram : Hon Duffy, J. in Court

Date of hearing : 15 December 1995

Date of handing down judgment : 20 December 1995

------------------------

J U D G M E N T

------------------------

1. This was an appeal against a sentence of 18 months imposed for using a forged Hong Kong identity card, possession of a forged Hong Kong identity card and remaining in Hong Kong without authority. For the first two offences, sentences of 18 months were passed and a 15 months sentence was passed on the third offence. All sentences were ordered to run concurrently. None of the sentences passed was outwith the normal range of sentences for offences of this nature and none were manifestly excessive.

2. However, it has been my experience in dealing with these appeals that sentences of 15 months are normally imposed for the offences of using a forged Hong Kong identity card and possession of a forged Hong Kong identity card. As an act of mercy, therefore, and to bring the sentences in line with the usual sentences imposed by magistrates for these offences, I reduced these sentences to 15 months and ordered that they all be served concurrently. The appeal is allowed to that extent.

Representation:

Mr Derek Pang, APCC (Ag), for Crown

Appellant in person

(J.M. Duffy)
Judge of the High Court