HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1996

R. v. Au Wai Lung

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
1978-EN-1996-10-02

R. v. Au Wai Lung

HTML content

CACC000222/1996

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1996, No. 222
(Criminal)

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
Au Wai LungApplicant

--------------------

 

Coram: Hon Nazareth, V.-P., Mortimer and Mayo, JJ.A.

Date of hearing: 2 October 1996

Date of judgment: 2 October 1996

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

Mayo, J.A. (giving the judgment of the Court):

1. The applicant seeks leave to appeal against the sentence of 3½ years' imprisonment imposed upon him for assisting the passage of unauthorised immigrants in Hong Kong. He pleaded guilty to this offence.

2. It was quite a bad case. Marine Police Officers observed a junk on their radar equipment proceeding towards Sha Tau Kok. They also noticed that it was not displaying navigation lights. They went to intercept it. When they did so the vessel which was being controlled by the applicant attempted to change direction and return to China. After a chase the police succeeded in apprehending the vessel. The applicant, a man and a heavily pregnant lady were found to be on board. It was noted that a junk of the type involved is normally confined to coastal waters. It will be appreciated from these facts that the applicant was prepared to take considerable risks to achieve his ends.

3. In mitigation before Lugar-Mawson DJ it was pleaded that the applicant had committed the offence for pecuniary gain and after his employer had subjected him to some pressure.

4. In his grounds of appeal the applicant refers to his difficult family circumstances namely his wife's pregnancy and his mother's ill health.

5. Before us he emphasised the difficulties he was experiencing.

6. Sadly these are not matters which would enable us to reduce the sentence which was imposed. The sentence which was imposed was the proper sentence in all the circumstances and this application has to be dismissed and is dismissed.

(G.P. Nazareth)(Barry Mortimer)(Simon Mayo)
Vice-PresidentJustice of AppealJustice of Appeal

Representation:

Mr D.G. Saw for Crown Prosecutor

Au Wai Lung - Applicant in person/present