HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1996

R. v. WONG HEUNG CHI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
4166-EN-1997-01-15

R. v. WONG HEUNG CHI

HTML content

CACC000424/1996

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1996, No. 424

(Criminal)

______________

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
and
WONG HEUNG CHIApplicant

______________

Coram: Hon Power Ag. CJ, Liu and Mayo, JJ.A. in Court

Date of hearing: 15 January 1997

Date of judgment: 15 January 1997

______________

J U D G M E N T

______________

Mayo JA giving the judgment of the Court:

1. The applicant now seeks leave to appeal only against the sentence of 51/2 years' imprisonment which is imposed upon him for trafficking in a dangerous drug. It was a straight-forward case where the applicant was the subject of a stop and search exercise. He was found to have on him 284.21 grams of a mixture containing 37.11 grams of heroin hydrochloride. This quantity of dangerous drugs falls within the middle to upper band of the second tier of sentences referred to in LAU Tak-ming. Her Honour Judge Wong adopted six years as a starting point and gave the applicant six months credit for his previous good character.

2. Before us the applicant referred to his family difficulties which had been occasioned as a result of his imprisonment. However notwithstanding this the sentence which was imposed upon him was in no way either manifestly excessive or wrong in principle. The application is dismissed. It was an unmeritorious application and we order that two months of the period he has served should not count as his sentence.

(N.P. Power)(B. Liu)(Simon Mayo)
Acting Chief JusticeJustice of AppealJustice of Appeal

Representation:

Mr D.G. Saw, SACP for the Crown

Wong Heung Chi - Applicant in person/present