HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1996

R. v. CHAN CHUNG KAN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
4466-EN-1997-01-09

R. v. CHAN CHUNG KAN

HTML content

CACC000455/1996

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1996, No. 455

(Criminal)

______________

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
and
CHAN CHUNG KANApplicant

______________

Coram: Hon Power, Ag. C.J., Mayo JA and Saied J in Court

Date of hearing: 9 January 1997

Date of judgment: 9 January 1997

______________

J U D G M E N T

______________

 

Mayo JA giving the judgment of the Court:

1. The applicant seeks leave to appeal against the sentence of six years' imprisonment imposed upon him for being in possession of arms and ammunition without a licence.

2. Police officers attending at the applicant's place of residence at Pei Hoi Street in Kowloon on 8 January 1996 found the applicant to be in possession of a Chinese type self-loading pistol and 19 rounds of ammunition. The applicant admitted possession and pleaded guilty to the offence.

3. Deputy Judge Jackson adopted 12 years as an appropriate starting point for this offence. He gave the applicant the usual discount of 1/3 for his plea. He also was advised that the applicant had provided useful information to the authorities which had assisted them in their inquiries. As a result of this he had increased the discount to 50% and thereby arrived at the six years' sentence which was passed.

4. In his grounds of appeal the applicant stresses the assistance he gave the police and contends that he should have received a larger discount than he did.

5. Before us he did not add anything of any significance. We consider that the starting point was correct and the discount given was the proper one. The sentence was in no way either excessive or wrong in principle. The application is dismissed.

(N.P. Power)(Simon Mayo)(Mohammed Saied)
Ag. Chief JusticeJustice of AppealJudge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr Albert Wong, SCC for Crown Prosecutor

Mr Chan Chung Kan - Applicant in person/present