HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1996

R. v. CHAN KWOK ON

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
6336-EN-1997-06-13

R. v. CHAN KWOK ON

HTML content

CACC000659/1996

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1996, No. 659

(Criminal)

______________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
CHAN KWOK ONApplicant

______________

 

Coram: Hon Power Ag. C.J., Mortimer and Mayo, JJ.A. in Court

Date of hearing: 13 June 1997

Date of judgment: 13 June 1997

______________

J U D G M E N T

______________

Mayo JA giving the judgment of the Court:

1. The applicant pleaded guilty to robbery and was sentenced to 4 years' imprisonment. He seeks leave to appeal against this sentence.

2. This was a robbery which occurred in a housing estate in Chai Wan at 9pm in the evening of 13 August 1996. The victim was a lady. After leaving a lift the applicant threatened the lady with a paper cutter and relieved her of her identity card, her credit cards, her telephone book and $5,700 in cash. He also inflicted a wound upon the lady's hand which fortunately was not a serious as it might have been.

3. Complaint is made that the trial judge HH Judge Hawkes adopted too high a starting point when he stated that he considered 6 years as an appropriate sentence after trial.

4. It is suggested that insufficient credit was given to the applicant to take account of his remorse and his relatively good record. Also it is suggested that he should have been given greater credit for having surrendered to the police.

5. There is no merit whatsoever in this application. Having regard to the facts of this case 6 years' imprisonment was a low starting point. The applicant was given a full discount of 1/3 and the sentence which was imposed was not a day too long. This application is dismissed.

(N.P. Power)
Ag. Chief Justice
(Barry Mortimer)
Justice of Appeal
(Simon Mayo)
Justice of Appeal

Representation:

Mr Arthur Luk for Crown Respondent

Mr Wong Po Wing (DLA) for Applicant