HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1996

R. v. WONG YIU CHUNG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
6541-EN-1996-06-27

R. v. WONG YIU CHUNG

HTML content

CACC000069/1996

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1996, No. 69
(Criminal)

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
WONG YIU CHUNGApplicant

---------------------------

Coram: Hon Yang, C.J., Power, V.-P. and Mayo, J.A.

Date of hearing: 27 June 1996

Date of judgment: 27 June 1996

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

Mayo, J.A. (giving the judgment of the Court):

1. The applicant seeks leave to appeal against the sentence of three years' imprisonment imposed upon him in respect of three counts of burglary. The applicant pleaded guilty to all these counts.

2. The modus operandi are similar in each case. The applicant broke into domestic premises at night and stole whatever cash he could find. All the burglaries were undertaken in the same block of flats which is the block where he resides with his family. The offences occurred in August, November and December 1993 and should accordingly be considered as separate and distinct offences. He was essentially caught red handed.

3. The trial judge HH Judge Hawkes considered three years' imprisonment to be an appropriate sentence in each case. However he felt unable to make all the offences concurrent and adopting the totality principle considered five years' imprisonment to be the appropriate starting point.

4. He gave the applicant a generous discount for his co-operation with the police and his guilty pleas.

5. It would appear from the background report which was obtained that the applicant has been addicted to heroin and that this was a factor which weighed heavily as constituting a motive for these offences.

6. In his grounds of appeal the applicant refers to his desire to turn over a new leaf.

7. He also referred to another case which was of little assistance.

8. The sentence was neither excessive nor wrong in principle. The application is dismissed.

(T.L. Yang)(N.P. Power)(Simon Mayo)
Chief JusticeVice PresidentJustice of Appeal

Representation:

Mr John Reading for Crown Prosecutor

Wong Yiu Chung - Applicant in person/present