HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1996

R. v. NG SHEUNG MAN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
6548-EN-1997-02-26

R. v. NG SHEUNG MAN

HTML content

CACC000690/1996

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1996, No. 690

(Criminal)

_______________

 

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
NG SHEUNG MANApplicant

_______________

 

Coram: Hon Mortimer J.A., Mayo J.A. and Sears J in Court

Date of hearing: 26 February 1997

Date of judgment: 26 February 1997

 

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

Mayo JA giving the judgment of the Court:

1. The applicant seeks leave to appeal against the sentence of 12 Months' imprisonment for being in possession of a small quantity of dangerous drugs. He pleaded guilty to the charge. The trial judge in his reasons for sentence states that he gave him the usual 1/3 discount for his plea.

2. The applicant has a bad record. He has according to the medical evidence been drug dependent for a number of years. He is a married man with a young family to support.

3. He referred us to the difficult circumstances being experienced by his family. This itself would not be a reason which would enable us to reduce the sentence which was passed. However we consider that the sentence was significantly higher than the normal range for possession of this amount of dangerous drug.

4. In our view an appropriate starting point would have been a sentence of 12 months' imprisonment. It is however necessary to give the usual discount for his guilty plea. Accordingly we allow the application and treating it as the appeal, order that the sentence of 8 months be substituted for the sentence which was imposed. The appeal is allowed to this extent.

(Barry Mortimer)(Simon Mayo)(R.A.W. Sears)
Justice of AppealJustice of AppealJudge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr A.A. Bruce QC & Ms Ho for Crown Prosecutor

NG Sheung Man - Applicant in person/present