HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1996

R. v. WONG KAM HUNG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
7184-EN-1996-05-31

R. v. WONG KAM HUNG

HTML content

CACC000082/1996

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1996, No. 82
(Criminal)

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
WONG KAM HUNGApplicant

--------------------------

Coram: Hon Power, V.-P., Mortimer and Mayo, JJ.A.

Date of hearing: 31 May 1996

Date of judgment: 31 May 1996

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

Mayo, J.A. (giving the judgment of the Court):

1. The applicant seeks leave to appeal against the sentence of 3 years' imprisonment imposed upon him for an assault with intent to rob. He pleaded guilty to the offence.

2. This was an attempted lift robbery. At about 6pm in the evening of 21 September 1995 the victim a lady was using a lift at the Shun On Estate. The applicant pressed a hard object against her neck and demanded that she gave him her handbag. She refused to do this. A struggle ensued. After the lady and the applicant emerged from the lift and the lady was calling out for assistance a neighbour came to her aid. The applicant attempted to escape but was apprehended by a police officer who was patrolling in the vicinity.

3. As a result of the struggle the victim sustained minor injuries.

4. In his grounds of appeal the applicant refers to his drug addiction and claims that he committed the offence in an endeavour to obtain money to feed his addiction.

5. Although he did not get the full 1/3 discount which is normally given on a guilty plea the overall sentence imposed was not in any way excessive or wrong in principle.

6. The application is accordingly dismissed.

(N.P. Power)(Barry Mortimer)(Simon Mayo)
Vice PresidentJustice of AppealJustice of Appeal

Representation:

Ms Crabtree, DPCC for Crown Prosecutor

Wong Kam Hung- Applicant in person/present