HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1996

R. v. WONG KWOK HUNG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
7279-EN-1997-01-30

R. v. WONG KWOK HUNG

HTML content

CACC000085/1996

1996, No.85
(Criminal)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

_____________

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
WONG KWOK HUNGApplicant

_____________

 

Coram: Hon. Litton, V.-P., Sears J. and Yeung J., in Court

Date of hearing: 30 January 1997

Date of judgment: 30 January 1997

_____________

J U D G M E N T

_____________

 

Sears, J. : (Delivering the judgment of the Court)

1. On January 10 1996 the applicant, together with another, was convicted of robbery before P. Chan J. and each was sentenced to 8 years imprisonment. On July 12 1996, the Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal against conviction.

2. The applicant has now made an application for leave to appeal against sentence out of time.

3. The only ground he has put forward for the delay is that he now considers that the sentence was too high. We can see no grounds for allowing the application for leave to appeal out of time and we would therefore dismiss it, but in our judgment the sentence that the judge imposed was obviously appropriate for this type of offence where a group of persons arm themselves with knives and carry out blindfolding and tying up people when they break into private premises.

4. The only matter which Mr Poll raises is that the applicant had given some evidence in a Customs' case unconnected with the current case and is intending to give evidence in the future in relation to certain disciplinary proceedings. The judge said that he did not take that into account. Even had he taken that into account, in our judgment, it would not have in anyway altered the overall sentence of eight years.

5. This application is therefore dismissed.

(H. Litton)
Vice-President
(R.A.W. Sears)
Judge of the High Court
(W. Yeung)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr A.A. Bruce, Q.C. & Mr Edmond Lee, for Crown/Respondent

Mr Michael Poll, (D.L.A.), for applicant