HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
1996

KO LAI MUI v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS

Related cases with same parties

  • CACV115/2012HAPPY DRAGON RESTAURANT LTD v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV115/2015PENNY’S BAY INVESTMENT CO LTD v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV116/2015PENNY’S BAY INVESTMENT CO LTD v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV118/2015HUNG HING AND 66 OTHERS v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV119/2015PENNY’S BAY INVESTMENT CO LTD v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV1/1987HONG KONG OIL CO. LTD v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV120/2015PENNY’S BAY INVESTMENT CO LTD v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV122/1996CHUM HON CHI v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV123/1996TSANG LING CHU v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV124/1996TSUI TAN FAI and Another v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV13/2015PENNY\'S BAY INVESTMENT CO LTD v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV14/2015PENNY\'S BAY INVESTMENT CO LTD v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV15/2015PENNY\'S BAY INVESTMENT CO LTD v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV16/2015PENNY\'S BAY INVESTMENT CO LTD v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV1636/2001NAM CHUN INVESTMENT CO. LTD. v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV170/2012CHAU TAM YUET CHING v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV175/1996CHAN CHAW MAN v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV176/1996LEE SAI HO v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV176/2007PENNY\'S BAY INVESTMENT CO LTD v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
  • CACV177/2007PENNY\'S BAY INVESTMENT CO LTD v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS
11055-EN-1997-05-27

KO LAI MUI v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS

HTML content

CACV000243/1996

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1996, No. 243

(Civil)

______________

 

BETWEEN
KO LAI MUIAppellant
AND
DIRECTOR OF LANDSRespondent

______________

 

Coram: Hon Nazareth Ag C.J., Bokhary & Liu JJ.A.

Date of hearing: 27 May 1997

Date of judgment: 27 May 1997

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

Liu JA:

1. This is an application by the Director of Lands to strike out the Notice of Appeal for disclosing no arguable points of law. The appellant is absent today. We do not propose to repeat the same reasons we gave in the other two appeals, Civil Appeal No. 201 of 1996 and Civil Appeal No. 218 of 1996. Suffice it for us to say, for the very same reasons, that the ground given in the Notice of Appeal is not appealable and the appeal is not competent. Accordingly, the appellant's Notice of Appeal is struck out as is her appeal.

(G P Nazareth)(K Bokhary)(B Liu)
Acting Chief JusticeJustice of AppealJustice of Appeal

Representation:

KO Lai-mui, appellant in person

Mr Raymond Tam, Sr.C.C. of Crown Solicitor for respondent