HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1996

R. v. YIP YIN LAN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
32429-EN-1996-10-25

R. v. YIP YIN LAN

HTML content

HCMA001021/1996

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1021 OF 1996

____________

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN
AND
YIP YIN LAN

____________

Coram: The Hon. Mr. Justice Keith in Court

Date of Hearing: 25 October 1996

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 25 October 1996

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1. On 24th May 1996 at Tuen Mun Magistrates' Court, the Appellant pleaded guilty to two charges. The first was possession of a forged Hong Kong identity card, and the second was remaining in Hong Kong without the authority of the Director of Immigration. She was sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment concurrent on both charges. She now appeals against her sentences, leave to do so out of time having been granted by the magistrate.

2. The facts of the case were unexceptional. The Appellant comes from China. She arrived in Hong Kong surreptitiously to take up employment so as to remit her earnings back home. She obtained the forged identity card before coming to Hong Kong for that purpose. However, what neither the Appellant nor the magistrate knew when she was sentenced was that she had very recently become pregnant. By the time the Appellant discovered that, it was too late for her to apply to the magistrate for a review, and she was left with no option but to appeal.

3. In his Reasons for Sentence, the magistrate stated that if he had known of her pregnancy, he "would have passed a much shorter sentence and/or suspended the term". I should give effect to what the magistrate would have done had he known the true circumstances. The Appellant has now been in custody for 5 months, and has therefore served the equivalent of a term of 7½ months' imprisonment. In my view, justice will be done if I reduce her sentence on each charge to ones of such length as allow for her immediate release and her repatriation to China. Accordingly, this appeal is allowed to that extent.

Representation:

Mr. A. R. Suffiad, instructed by the Director of Legal Aid, for the Appellant.

Mr. Frank Veltro, Senior Crown Counsel, for the Crown.

(Brian Keith)
Judge of the High Court