HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1996

THE QUEEN v. TANG KWOK WAI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
16600-EN-1996-03-12

THE QUEEN v. TANG KWOK WAI

HTML content

HCMA000108/1996

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 108 OF 1996

------------------

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
TANG KWOK WAIAppellant

-------------------

Coram : Hon Duffy, J. in Court

Date of hearing : 12 March 1996

Date of judgment : 12 March 1996

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

1. This was an appeal against a sentence of 18 months for a series of offences involving the defrauding of the Standard Chartered Bank of $33,000.

2. The Appellant had forged documents and had obtained a credit card by use of these forged documents and had used the credit card to obtain credit of up to $33,000.

3. In his Reasons for Sentence, the learned Magistrate said this :-

"However the offences were serious involving fraud on a bank. They were premeditated offences with planning though not sophisticated. A term of imprisonment was inevitable. Taking into account of all mitigating factors and the principle that a first term of imprisonment should be as short as possible, I thought the circumstances warranted a term of eighteen months imprisonment."

Since the learned Magistrate imposed this sentence the Appellant has returned $20,000 to the bank. I considered the sentence of 18 months was unnecessarily severe, given the mitigating circumstances which existed including the Appellant's plea of guilty and the fact that the offences were committed when he was under tremendous financial pressure. Taking all things into account, I thought a sentence of nine months for each offence was sufficient in this case, and I allowed the appeal accordingly, all sentences to be concurrent.

Representation:

Mr F. Veltro, C.C., for Crown

Appellant, Tang Kwok Wai, in person

- 2 -

(J.M. Duffy)
Judge of the High Court