HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1996

R. v. SO WING-SAN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
32430-EN-1996-12-27

R. v. SO WING-SAN

HTML content

HCMA001144/1996

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1144 OF 1996

______________

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN
and
SO WING-SAN

______________

Coram: Stuart-Moore, J. in Court

Date of hearing: 27 December 1996

Date of judgment: 27 December 1996

______________

J U D G M E N T

______________

1. The Appellant was convicted, on 2nd September 1996, of careless driving by Mr. Patrick Li sitting at the Fanling Magistracy. He was fined $1,500 and he now appeals against his conviction only.

2. The Appellant is a bus driver and was allegedly seen by a police officer on a motorcycle cutting into the path of a taxi that had to slow down very suddenly as a result of the bus making this manoeuvre. The Appellant denied this and said that he had stopped before moving forwards at the slip road.

3. The learned Magistrate heard and saw the witnesses as the evidence unfolded in his court. I do not have that advantage but I have read what the witnesses had said to the Magistrate. I am not here to re-try the case. I can only interfere if the Magistrate fell into error in the way that he approached the evidence. His approach to the evidence was impeccable and there are no grounds on which I could possibly allow this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed.

(M. Stuart Moore)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr. Y.M. Liu, S.C.C. for Crown.

Appellant in person.