HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1996

R. v. LEUNG CHI TONG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1994R. v. CHING WAI FAN, CARINA
  • CAAR12/1994R. v. TUEN Shui Ming and Another
  • CAAR13/1993R. v. WONG SHU KAN
  • CAAR3/1993R. v. NG SHEUNG CHUN
  • CAAR3/1995R. v. YU YUN HEI
  • CAAR5/1993R. v. KWOK CHI KEUNG
  • CAAR5/1995R. v. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG
  • CAAR9/1995R. v. CHAN SIU YUN
  • CACC100/1993NG YUK HUNG and Others v. R.
  • CACC100/1995R. v. CHAN LAM
  • CACC100/1996R. v. LI CHI MING
  • CACC101/1994CHAN CHONG HEI v. R.
  • CACC10/1994TAM Shing-li v. R.
  • CACC10/1996R. v. AU YEUNG CHI MAN
  • CACC102/1993LEE WING ON v. R.
  • CACC102/1994R. v. CHEUNG KIN SHING and Others
  • CACC102/1995R. v. LAI FOR-SHUN and Another
  • CACC102/1996R. v. CHOI MAN HAY
  • CACC103/1994CHAN KWOK-HING v. R.
  • CACC103/1996R. v. FUNG CHI SHING and Another
32342-EN-1996-07-11

R. v. LEUNG CHI TONG

HTML content

HCMA000585/1996

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.585 of 1996

----------------------

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
LEUNG CHI TONGAppellant

-----------------------

 

Coram : Hon Patrick Chan, J. in Court

Date of hearing : 11 July 1996

Date of judgment : 11 July 1996

--------------------

J U D G M E N T

--------------------

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to possession of dangerous drugs, namely a packet containing 0.1 gramme of a mixture containing 0.08 gramme heroin hydrochloride. He was sentenced to 9 months imprisonment.

2. He was stopped and searched in the street and found to have the dangerous drug. He admitted that the drug was for his own consumption. He is 46 years of age, single and has worked as a labourer earning $5,000 a month. He has overall 20 previous convictions, three of which were not recorded. Out of these convictions there were three drug offences. He started to commit offences since the age of 14. He now appears before me and urges that since the quantity was small, he should get a lighter sentence.

3. I accept that the quantity is small, but it seems that sentences for this type of offence have become stiffer. Looking at the circumstances of this case, while I think the sentence of 9 months appears to be on the high side, I am not sure that I should interfere with the discretion of the learned Magistrate. The appeal is dismissed.

Representation:

Mr Wesley Wong, Senior Crown Prosecutor, for Crown

Appellant Leung Chi Tong, in person

(Patrick Chan)
Judge of the High Court