HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1996

THE QUEEN v. WONG YUN WING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
32268-EN-1996-02-07

THE QUEEN v. WONG YUN WING

HTML content

HCMA000059/1996

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 59 OF 1996

----------------------

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
WONG YUN WINGAppellant

-----------------------

Coram : Hon. Duffy, J. in Court

Date of hearing : 2 February 1996

Date of handing down judgment : 7 February 1996

---------------------

J U D G M E N T

--------------------

1. This was an appeal against a sentence of a fine and a disqualification for 12 months for driving without third party insurance. The Appellant was driving his employer's vehicle, having been instructed to do so. He submitted to me on the appeal that had he not obeyed his employer's instructions he would have been sacked. He further submitted that he was not aware that the insurance policy for the vehicle did not cover himself as a driver.

2. I felt that a special reason could be constructed in this case from the fact that the Appellant was in an employee/employer situation. It was the employer's responsibility in the main to determine whether or not the Appellant was qualified and insured to drive his vehicle. I felt that in all the circumstances I could allow the appeal and reduce the disqualification period to one of six months.

Representation:

Mr W.S. Cheung, SACP, for Crown

Appellant Wong Yun Wing in person.

- 2 -

(J.M. Duffy)
Judge of the High Court