HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1996

THE QUEEN v. HO KAM LOI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
27896-EN-1996-09-06

THE QUEEN v. HO KAM LOI

HTML content

HCMA000604/1996

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

 

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.604 OF 1996

-----------------

 

BETWEEN  
 THE QUEENRespondent
 and 
 HO KAM LOIAppellant

-----------------

Coram: Hon Gall, J. in Court

Date of hearing: 6th September 1996

Date of judgment: 6th September 1996

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant was convicted after trial on 1st April 1996 and was sentenced by the magistrate to two years' imprisonment for trafficking in a dangerous drug. He had trafficked, at 4:30 in the morning in a playground in the Yau Ma Tei, in one packet of dangerous drug being heroin and being a mixture of 0.3 gramme containing 0.05 gramme of heroin hydrochloride.

2. The appellant had a previous criminal history relating to dangerous drugs. He had, however, since 1975, no conviction prior to this matter other than causing wasteful employment of police time in 1980, and his last criminal conviction was for smoking dangerous drugs in April 1974. To all intent and purposes, the appellant was a man of clear record in respect of trafficking in a dangerous drug.

3. The learned magistrate in his consideration of sentence rejected the submission and said that the Drug Addiction Treatment Centre was an appropriate penalty and said "No remorse was shown by the 1st defendant, I impose an imprisonment term of two years on the 1st defendant". It would have been appropriate although the magistrate noted the record of the appellant and that the magistrate take into account the long period of time since the appellant has offended in respect of dangerous drugs.

4. The appeal against sentence is allowed and a sentence of 15 months imprisonment is substituted for that of two years.

 

 

 (T.M.Gall)
 Judge of the High Court

 

Representation:

Ms Maggie Yang, C.C., for Crown

Mr Anthony Mitchell-Heggs, inst'd by M/s Massie & Pickavant, for appellant