HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1996

THE QUEEN v. LAI SAU CHING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
16591-EN-1996-02-07

THE QUEEN v. LAI SAU CHING

HTML content

HCMA000063/1996

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 63 OF 1996

----------------------

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent
AND
LAI SAU CHINGAppellant

-----------------------

Coram : Hon. Duffy, J. in Court

Date of hearing : 2 February 1996

Date of handing down judgment : 7 February 1996

---------------------

J U D G M E N T

--------------------

1. This was an appeal against a conviction and sentence for a parking offence. Suffice it to say that so far as the conviction was concerned, I found no merit in the Appellant's submissions and dismissed the appeal.

2. However, so far as sentence was concerned the learned Magistrate gave no reasons for the imposition of a costs award and for increasing the penalty from $320.00 to $640.00. I felt in all the circumstances that the fixed penalty of $320.00 was adequate for this offence. I therefore allowed the appeal, removed the added penalty of $320.00 and the costs award.

Representation:

Mr W.S. Cheung, SACP, for Crown

Appellant Lai Sau Ching in person

(J.M. Duffy)
Judge of the High Court