HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1996

THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON SHING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
36623-EN-1996-09-20

THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON SHING

HTML content

HCMA000912/1996

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT 
  
 1996, No. 912
 Magistracy Appeal

 

BETWEEN  
 THE QUEENRespondent
 and 
 CHAN KOON SHINGAppellant

-----------------

Coram: Hon Mayo JA in Court (sitting as an additional High Court Judge)

Date of Hearing: 20 September 1996

Date of Judgment: 20 September 1996

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Mayo JA:

1. The appellant appeals against the sentence of six months' imprisonment imposed upon him for possession of a small quantity of dangerous drugs. At his trial before the learned magistrate Mr Candy he pleaded guilty. The magistrate passed a sentence of six months' imprisonment in accordance with the principles laid down in The Queen v. Chan Tak King [1989] 2 HKLR 428.

2. It is clear from his record that the appellant has had a problem with drugs for many years.

3. The appellant claims the sentence was too severe. I disagree. There is no merit in this appeal and it is dismissed.

 

 

 (Simon Mayo)
 sitting as an additional High Court Judge

 

Representation:

Mr Arthur Luk for Crown Prosecutor

Chan Koon Shing- Appellant in person/present