HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1997

HKSAR v. CHAN KAM WA

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
2573-EN-1997-11-19

HKSAR v. CHAN KAM WA

HTML content

CACC000279/1997

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1997, No.279
(Criminal)

BETWEEN
HKSAR
AND
CHAN KAM-WA

-------------------------------

 

Coram: Hon. Power, V.-P., Mayo, J.A. & Stuart-Moore, J.

Date of Hearing: 19 November 1997

Date of Judgment: 19 November 1997

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

Power, V.-P. (giving the judgment of the Court):

1. In this matter the applicant pleaded guilty to one charge of trafficking in dangerous drugs. The amount involved was 15.94 grammes of a mixture containing 13.25 grammes of heroin. The trial judge, correctly, when sentencing, took a starting point of five years. He said:

"Pleas of guilty are to be encouraged. Current thinking is that for a plea on the first possible occasion a discount of one-third of the sentence is allowed. A plea on the last possible occasion, as in this instance, attracts a discount of one quarter. Consequently, the period of 5 years falls to be reduced to 3 years and 9 months.."

No criticism can be made of that sentence. We repeat what the judge said - a one-third discount will be given where the plea has been made at the earliest possible opportunity, and the failure to plead then and to enter a plea at a later stage will not attract the full one-third discount. This applicant may have been under some misapprehension in this matter and so, although his appeal was without merit, we will not order loss of time.

2. The application is dismissed.

(N.P. Power)(Simon Mayo)(M. Stuart-Moore)
Vice-PresidentJustice of AppealJudge of the Court of First Instance of the High Court

Representation:

Ms.Chan Fung-shan, Denise, S.G.C. (D.P.P.) for the Respondent.

Applicant in person.