HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1997

THE QUEEN v. CHEUNG WO PING AND ANOTHER

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
4511-EN-1997-05-21

THE QUEEN v. CHEUNG WO PING AND ANOTHER

HTML content

CACC000046/1997

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL1997, No. 46
(Criminal)

BETWEEN
THE QUEENRespondent

AND

CHEUNG WO PING1st Applicant
MAN SIU WA2nd Applicant

-----------------

Coram: Hon Litton V-P, Mortimer and Mayo, JJ.A. in Court

Date of hearing: 21 May 1997

Date of judgment: 21 May 1997

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Mayo JA giving the judgment of the Court:

1. Both applicants pleaded guilty to robbery and being in Hong Kong without the authority of the Director of Immigration. They were sentenced to a total of 4 years and 2 months' imprisonment and now seek leave to appeal against the sentences imposed.

2. The facts are all too distressingly familiar. The victim of the robbery was using the public toilet facilities at Chater Garden in Central. While leaving he was approached by two men. One of the men produced a razor blade and they informed him that he was being robbed. A1 took the victim's wallet from his pocket and extracted all the cash from it which amounted to about $120. The wallet was then returned and the men fled from the scene.

3. When the victim came out from the toilet he saw a police officer and reported the robbery to him. The officer used his beat radio to inform other officers in the vicinity of what had transpired. Two other police officers on duty saw two men who answered to the description they had been given and they stopped the men and asked them to produce their identity cards. The men in question were A1 and A2. They admitted that they were illegal immigrants. The officers brought them back to the scene of the crime and the victim identified the applicants as being the men who had robbed him.

4. Her Honour Judge Beeson adopted 5 years as the starting point for the robbery and 15 months for the immigration offence and gave the usual 1/3 discounts for the pleas. She ordered that the sentences be served consecutively.

5. The sentences were perfectly proper sentences and the applications are dismissed.

 

 

(Henry Litton)(Barry Mortimer)(Simon Mayo)
Vice-PresidentJustice of AppealJustice of Appeal

 

Representation:

Mr D.G. Saw QC, SACP & Mr S.L. Tam, CC for Crown Prosecutor

Cheung Wo Ping - 1st Applicant in person/present

Man Siu Wa - 2nd Applicant in person/present