HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1997

HKSAR v. WOO MING ON

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
17346-EN-1998-02-10

HKSAR v. WOO MING ON

HTML content

HCMA001028/1997

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1028 OF 1997

____________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
WOO MING ONAppellant

____________

 

Coram : The Hon. Madam Justice Beeson in Court

Date of Hearing : 10 February 1998

Date of Delivery of Judgment : 10 February 1998

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1. This Appellant appeals against a sentence of 9 months' imprisonment imposed on him for an offence of Theft. The theft concerned the taking of a mobile phone from an unsecured light goods vehicle. Appellant had 14 previous offences 6 of which involved dishonesty, the remainder were drug offences.

2. The magistrate took into account the fact this was an offence committed on the spur of the moment, he obtained a Drug Addiction Treatment Centre report in the light of his knowledge of the Appellant's drug addiction; that report contained full details of the Defendant's personal background. The magistrate took a starting point of 12 months and reduced it to 9 months for plea. I can see nothing wrong with the starting point or the resulting sentence. I am satisfied with the magistrate took the appropriate matters into account. The appeal is dismissed.

Representation:

Johnny Chan, S.G.C. for D.P.P.

Ms Corinne Remedios, instructed by D.L.A. for Appellant - Woo Ming On

(C.M. Beeson)
Judge of the Court of First Instance