HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1997

HKSAR v. Cheung Pak-chuen

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
17297-EN-1997-08-14

HKSAR v. Cheung Pak-chuen

HTML content

HCMA000517/1997

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Magistracy Appeal No. 517 of 1997

_________

BETWEEN
Cheung Pak-chuenAppellant
and
HKSARRespondent

_________

Coram: Beeson, D. J.

Date: 14 August 1997

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1. The defendant appeals against his conviction for a charge of robbery, committed on 14 November 1996. The evidence, which was carefully considered by the magistrate, shows that what apparently began as a transaction for sexual services, with the police officer being used as a decoy, later developed into a robbery with some violence when the parties came down to the street.

2. The sum of $3,000 was snatched from the police officer. He was manhandled by the first and second defendants and threatened, additionally, with a beating. This appellant had access to a car, and the defendants were caught about an hour later in San Po Kong.

3. I am satisfied, having considered the details in the transcript and magistrate's statement of findings that there was ample evidence on which the magistrate could convict and that he properly considered all the issues. The appeal against conviction is dismissed.

(C. Beeson)
Deputy Judge of the
Court of First Instance

 

Representation:

Mr Cheung Pak-chuen, Appellant, in person

Mr W. S. Cheung, Government Counsel, for Respondent