HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1997

HKSAR v. LEUNG CHUN HING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
17337-EN-1997-12-16

HKSAR v. LEUNG CHUN HING

HTML content

HCMA000921/1997

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 921 OF 1997

____________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
LEUNG CHUN HINGAppellant

____________

Coram: The Honourable Madam Justice Beeson in Court

Date of Hearing: 16 December 1997

Date of Judgment: 16 December 1997

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1. The Appellant in this case appeals against conviction for an offence of attempted theft. The attempted theft was of a wallet from a rucksack carried by a customer in a shop. The incident was observed by two police officers.

2. I have considered the Statement of Findings of the magistrate and compared it with the transcript of the trial hearing. It appears to me that the magistrate was fully aware of the apparent discrepancies in the evidence and that he did evaluate and resolve them.

3. He rejected, as he was entitled to do, the evidence of the first witness who was the victim, where it conflicted with that of the two police officers. The police officers had a view of the proceedings throughout and their view of the proceedings was obviously far better that that of the victim who was carrying the rucksack on his back. I do not find anything unsafe or unsatisfactory about the conviction and the appeal is dismissed.

Representation:

Ms. Alice Chan, Government Counsel for D.P.P.

P. Francis, of Paul Kwong & Co. for Appellant.

(C.M. Beeson)
Judge of the Court of First Instance