HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1998

HKSAR v. CHOI KWOK MAN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
22343-EN-1999-05-21

HKSAR v. CHOI KWOK MAN

HTML content

HCMA001073/1998

1998, HCMA 1073

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 1073 OF 1998

_______________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
CHOI KWOK MANAppellant

________________

Coram: The Honourable Mrs Justice V. Bokhary in Court

Date of Hearing: 21 May 1999

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 21 May 1999

________________

J U D G M E N T

________________

1. This Appellant was tried before Abu B. bin Wahab, Esquire in the Magistrate's Court at Western on one charge of selling liquor without a licence. On 24th September 1998, he was convicted, and was fined $1,500.00 and ordered to pay costs in the sum of $500.00. He now appeals against conviction.

2. He lodged his Notice of Appeal against Conviction in the standard form but has written no ground of appeal thereon.

3. In his Statement of Findings, the Magistrate adopted the reasons which he had given when he convicted the Appellant. Having considered those reasons, I propose to say no more than that I am fully satisfied with the propriety of the conviction. The appeal is dismissed.

(V. Bokhary)
Judge of the Court of First Instance,
High Court

Representation:

Choi Kwok Man, Appellant in person

Mr Hayson K.S. Tse (of the Department of Justice) for the Respondent